Re: [Chicken-users] Implementing a macroexpand-all

[Patrick Li]

Thanks for the help Felix!

There's one more question I stumbled upon actually. Do you know of some way I can tell if a symbol *actually* refers to lambda or let? 

eg. after some macro expansions, a form might look like (lambda89 (x y) body ...)

where lambda89 is equivalent to lambda. 

Given a symbol, I need to check whether it refers to a macro or not.

  -Patrick

On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Felix <address@hidden> wrote:

> Does anyone know which forms introduce new bindings? How can I check this
> up?

`let' and `lambda' introduce new bindings. `let' is not transformed into
`lambda', it is handled as a primitive.


cheers,
felix