|
| From: | Jörg F . Wittenberger |
| Subject: | Re: [Chicken-users] valgrind - more details |
| Date: | 05 Oct 2011 23:11:18 +0200 |
On Oct 5 2011, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
I found two occurrences of strlen (C_strlen that is), which would
for no good reason scan the memory while the result could be computed
by simple pointer arithmetic:
@@ -7519,19 +7515,19 @@
errno = 0;
... Sorry. Somehow cut&paste made a mess out of the diff citations. Gladly I appended the full diff. But note: this change only removes unnecessary complexity from the code. The code itself is sill somewhat incomprehensible to me. I'm not sure that I'm in a position to supply incremental improvements here. Best regareds /Jörg
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |