Re: [Chicken-users] Problems with rationals

[Peter Bex]

On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 04:20:40PM -0400, John Cowan wrote:
> You do get a warning about coercion to flonum from (rational? 6/10),
> but you also get the right answer, namely #t.

Right, that *should* be the answer.

> BTW, I think you should go ahead and release the trunk numbers egg.
> It surely has fewer bugs than the current release, even if it's not
> Practically Perfect In Every Way.

It's pending one patch to Chicken core currently on -hackers.  Depending
on which way this goes it needs a change in numbers to make it consistent.
After that, yes there can be a release.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
 is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
 and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
 experience much like composing poetry or music."
                                                        -- Donald Knuth