[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] ANN: Binding for libsdl-mixer available
From: |
Moritz Heidkamp |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] ANN: Binding for libsdl-mixer available |
Date: |
Mon, 28 May 2012 14:46:40 +0200 |
Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> writes:
>> A question regarding the API: Is the "music" term inherited from SDL?
>
> Yes.
OK, best to keep it this way then.
>> And what's the difference to "sample"? Looks like the "music" functions
>> play samples asynchronously. If so I'd vote for renaming it (to
>
> Both play asynchronously. Samples are mixed together in
> channels. Output is always the channels plus 1 music channel.
I see, thanks for the clarification!
>> something like play-sample/async, only better) since music isn't
>> necessarily the only thing one would want to play in background :-)
>
> I think the /async is redundant...
Right, if both are asynchronous it is. That suggestion was under the
assumption that play-sample was synchronous. Then all is well :-)
Moritz