Re: [Chicken-users] Segfault with large data-structures (bug)

[Peter Bex]

On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:37:42PM +0100, Felix wrote:
> The intention is to provide some sort of soft "ulimit" at the
> application level, in case you want to make sure a certain maximum
> amount of memory is not exceeded. Or if you want to benchmark memory
> consumption, or do other whacky things. So let's keep it for a while.

But why not just use ulimit?  It can be set per process, so I don't see
the need to have a second ulimit-like limit inside each process.

Cheers,
Peter
-- 
http://sjamaan.ath.cx