[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses"
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses" |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 10:21:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:07:15AM +0100, Jörg F. Wittenberger wrote:
> What's more tricky is that bindings, e.g., make-hash-table
> resolve to unbond in the runtime initialization even though
> there is an (import srfi-69) in the module.
>
> I can "fix" this by giving a (uses srfi-69) before the module.
> But that's precisely what I feel it's wrong.
import only loads the import library, it doesn't load the actual code.
For that you need to use require-library, or you can change the
import statement to be (require-extension srfi-69) or (use srfi-69),
which both loads and imports.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses",
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Peter Bex, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/03/25
- Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/25
Re: [Chicken-users] to "uses" or not to "uses", Moritz Heidkamp, 2013/03/24