Re: [Chicken-users] bind egg and strings

[Andrei Barbu]

Hey!

> I've applied the 64-bit fix and partially added the patch regarding
> c-string/char-ptrs in mutable struct slots. I'm somehow reluctant to

Thanks!

> add the "...*" accessor variant - I fear that this adds a lot of
> redundant bindings that are never used in most cases. By prefixing a
> slot type with "___pointer" one always has the option to treat a char*
> as a pointer object instead of a c-string. If you can live with that,

Okies. I can live without the c-pointer version.

> I can tag a new version of the bind egg. Otherwise we should discuss
> this some more. I don't recall the whole discussion so it is possible
> that I have overlooked something important.

Sounds great.



Andrei