[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*
From: |
Peter Bex |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Named let* |
Date: |
Fri, 24 May 2013 23:44:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.3i |
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:37:12PM +0200, Michele La Monaca wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> R5RS doesn't specify this kind of syntax (nor Chicken supports it):
>
> (let* loop ((a <init>) (b a))
> <body>)
>
> To me it seems a missing piece of syntax. Am I wrong?
I've missed it occasionally as well, but I'm not sure it's *that* useful.
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://www.more-magic.net
- [Chicken-users] Named let*, Michele La Monaca, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Danny Gratzer, 2013/05/24
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*,
Peter Bex <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Michele La Monaca, 2013/05/27
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Jörg F . Wittenberger, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Patrick Li, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Michele La Monaca, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Patrick Li, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Jim Ursetto, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Michele La Monaca, 2013/05/29
- Re: [Chicken-users] Named let*, Michele La Monaca, 2013/05/29