Re: [Chicken-users] Protocol Buffers for CHICKEN

[Thomas Chust]

On 2013-05-30 22:32, Felix wrote:
> [...]
> Very good - thanks a lot! I'll give this a try. Should we simply replace
> the serialization or do you think it would make sense to let the user
> choose a serialization mechanism for suspensions?
> [...]

Hello Felix,

I'm not sure the suspension egg needs a dependency on a serializer at
all. It would still serve its purpose if continuation-suspend and
continuation-resume passed around the native continuation objects and
let the client do the serialization.

And configurability is almost always a good thing :-)

Ciao,
Thomas


-- 
When C++ is your hammer, every problem looks like your thumb.