[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] dynamic scoping
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] dynamic scoping |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:19:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Kon Lovett scripsit:
> Sadly, John Cowan's fine table of SRFI support by implementation
> doesn't cover SRFI 15.
When I did it, I wasn't dealing with withdrawn SRFIs. As I just said,
fluid-let's definition is highly portable in a single-threaded context.
> In practice real dynamic variables - parameters - are the way to go
> for library or other distributed code. & they are in R7RS!
Yes, indeed. Also unlike fluid-let, parameters are first class objects.
--
With techies, I've generally found John Cowan
If your arguments lose the first round http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Make it rhyme, make it scan address@hidden
Then you generally can
Make the same stupid point seem profound! --Jonathan Robie