[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 09:44:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Michele La Monaca scripsit:
> Mingw
> #;1> (print 1.0 "\n" 2.0 "\n" 3.10)
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.1
It's a deviation but not a bug. Except for the four cases of
+inf.0, -inf.0, +nan.0, and -0.0, Chicken uses the local C's idea of
number-to-string conversion. Since "1." is a valid Scheme inexact number,
that's perfectly fine.
--
How they ever reached any conclusion at all <address@hidden>
is starkly unknowable to the human mind. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--"Backstage Lensman", Randall Garrett
- [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, John Cowan, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Jim Ursetto, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Jim Ursetto, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Peter Bex, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Felix, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Mario Domenech Goulart, 2013/07/09
- Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw, Michele La Monaca, 2013/07/09