Re: [Chicken-users] Exact flownums not properly displayed in mingw

[Michele La Monaca]

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:
> If you're really concerned about this (which is ultimately aesthetic)

Is this acceptable?

C:\TMP>chicken-status | tail -3
socket ....................................................... version: 0.2.3
srfi-37 ...................................................... version: 1.3.1
win32-msgbox .................................................... version: 1.

> then you should consider setting flonum-print-precision to 17, which will
> make an actual difference in rare
> cases.  http://api.call-cc.org/doc/library/flonum-print-precision

It doesn't seem to do any difference (in this case at least). Thanks, anyway.

Michele