Re: [Chicken-users] New leveldb eggs

[Caolan McMahon]

>> I'm hoping to write (or encourage someone else to write) a
>memory-only
>> implementation of the 'level' API, which would be useful for testing
>> or other circumstances where you want to use a module written to the
>> 'level' interface without persisting data.
>
>Sounds useful.  And perhaps some integration with a relational DB, or
>other types of stores (memcached?) could be added.

Yes, that would be great. There are already key value store eggs based on 
sqlite in the egg index, perhaps one of those could be adapted to an egg 
exposing the level api...

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.