Re: [Chicken-users] A question about library search order

[John Cowan]

Oleg Kolosov scripsit:

> When writing multi-module application I've found that Chicken searches
> for extensions in repository only and import libraries in the supplied
> include-path's additionally. Judging from the sources, this behaviour is
> intentional. Doesn't it make more sense to always search in user
> supplied include paths first, and the repository path last, similar to
> how C compilers search <> includes?

I agree that that would be better.  What was the reason for searching
the repository first?

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        address@hidden
Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML Infoset, as long as it has
a door sticker saying "No information items inside".  --Eve Maler