Re: [Chicken-users] Minor problem with args egg

[Matt Gushee]

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Jim Ursetto <address@hidden> wrote:

#t does seem to make sense ... the existing behavior comes from the srfi-37 implementation which sets the value to #f for #:none args.

Oh, yes, I see. I think #f would be reasonable if you were processing options with args-fold. Not so much if you want to use alist-ref - which, judging by your examples, is a practice you endorse.

 

I could modify the args egg to change #f to #t in this case; I don't think this would cause any problems.  Will think it over tonight.

Thanks for looking at it.

Matt