[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums
From: |
John Long |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2015 11:16:43 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 09:50:18PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 11:39:50AM -0700, Martin DeMello wrote:
> > Post to /r/scheme about chicken's bignum performance. (Not my post,
> > just figured it could use some eyeballs.)
> >
> > http://www.reddit.com/r/scheme/comments/3b1ujw/performance_of_chicken_scheme_numbers_bignums/
>
> Hello Martin,
>
> Thanks for posting this. We had already been discussing it earlier
> today in #chicken. I had another look at the code but I can't really
> find any obvious inefficiencies. It is indeed a bit faster with
> CHICKEN 5, but not by much.
>
> Of course, Guile is "cheating" by using GMP. If I compare it to another
> Scheme which has its own bignum implementation like Gauche, we perform
> about the same. It's interesting that sbcl is doing so well. Maybe I'm
> overlooking something seemingly minor but important?
I didn't read much of this thread but I believe sbcl also uses gmp.
/jl
--
ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong
against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD
and proprietary / \ http://www.mutt.org
attachments / \ Code Blue or Go Home!
Encrypted email preferred PGP Key 2048R/DA65BC04
- Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums, (continued)
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums, Stephen Eilert, 2015/06/25
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums, cowan, 2015/06/25
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums,
John Long <=