[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums
From: |
Kooda |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 01:16:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23.1-rc1 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 09:47:30PM +0200, Peter Bex wrote:
> So far it seems my implementation of Burnikel/Ziegler division is rather
> unstable, performance-wise. If I disable burnikel/ziegler so it falls
> back to the traditional gradebook method, the benchmark finishes in
> a quarter of the time it takes to run with BZ enabled.
>
> It's not just that the BZ implementation is really bad: it does improve
> performance on Chudnovsky's "digits of pi" calculation benchmark by a
> factor of four or so. I will do further experimentation. I also noticed
> a bug in the gradebook method, which I will have to address as well.
>
Thanks a lot for putting so much effort in this!
If you need anything please do not hesitate to ask, I’m really excited
about that feature in CHICKEN 5 (and surely I’m not alone). :)
--
Envoyé depuis ma GameBoy.
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums, cowan, 2015/06/25
Re: [Chicken-users] performance of bignums, John Long, 2015/06/26