Re: [Chicken-users] sequential version of set!

[John Cowan]

Alexej Magura scripsit:

> Is there a sequential version of /set!/, as in /setq/?

There isn't, though it would be straightforward to write a macro.
Scheme doesn't put as much emphasis on mutation as Common Lisp does;
note that while `do` looks the same in Scheme as in Common Lisp,
it does not mutate the iteration variables but rebinds them, and
named `let` is all about looping while rebinding.

-- 
John Cowan          http://www.ccil.org/~cowan        address@hidden
You know, you haven't stopped talking since I came here. You must
have been vaccinated with a phonograph needle.
        --Rufus T. Firefly