Re: [Chicken-users] Compiling multiple modules into a single executable

[Josh Barrett]

Of course I can. Hopefully, it will help:
---
$ cat foo.scm
(declare (unit foo))

(module foo (quux)
  (import chicken scheme)
  (define (quux)
    (display "quux")))

$ cat bar.scm
(declare (unit bar))
(declare (uses foo))

(module bar (baz)
  (import chicken scheme)
  (import foo)
  (define (baz)
    (quux)
    (display "baz\n")))

$ csc -c foo.scm bar.scm

Syntax error (import): cannot import from undefined module
---
As I understand it, this should work, but it obviously doesn't. Does anybody know why?

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016, 16:17 Christian Kellermann <address@hidden> wrote:

* Josh Barrett <address@hidden> [161016 21:57]:
> I really like modules. I tend to use several per project, if not one per
> file. However, when it comes time to compile an executable, I'd rather not
> have 50 random .so files cluttering up the place. I've tried using
> compilation units (which seems to be the endorsed method of compiling
> multiple files together), but I can't get them to work with modules.

Those two concepts don't contradict each other, you can use both.

Can you show us a simple example of your use case that does not work?

Kind regards,

Christian


--
May you be peaceful, may you live in safety, may you be free from
suffering, and may you live with ease.