Re: [Classpath-inetlib] TrustManager?

[petite_abeille]

Hello,

On Jun 15, 2004, at 15:36, Chris Burdess wrote:

> I would prefer to overload starttls() with a version that takes a
> TrustManager, unless anyone has any objections. This gives the
> interface:
>
>   public void starttls ();
>
>   public void starttls (TrustManager tm);

Works for me.

> Question: are there likely to be other aspects that will typically need
> to be customised? e.g. KeyStore?

Hmmm... I think that a custom TrustManager will be able to handle all 
the other security issues.

Cheers,

PA.