[Classpath-inetlib] IMAP store / folder hierarchy

[Ruben Malchow]

maybe i'm being stupid, but:

i'm doing an IMAPStore.getDefaultFolder();

which returns a non-existing folder with an empty name. then i 
recursively list this folder:


foldername: ""
listing ""
imap: > A3 LIST "" %
imap: < * LIST [\Marked, \HasChildren] "." "INBOX"
imap: < A3 OK LIST completed

foldername:"INBOX"
listing "INBOX"
imap: > A4 LIST INBOX %
imap: < * LIST [\HasNoChildren] "." "INBOX.Drafts"
imap: < * LIST [\HasNoChildren] "." "INBOX.Sent"
imap: < * LIST [\HasNoChildren] "." "INBOX.Trash"
imap: < A4 OK LIST completed

foldername: "INBOX.INBOX.Drafts"
listing "INBOX.INBOX.Drafts"
imap: > A5 LIST INBOX.INBOX.Drafts %
imap: < A5 OK LIST completed

foldername: "INBOX.INBOX.Sent"
listing "INBOX.INBOX.Sent"
imap: > A6 LIST INBOX.INBOX.Sent %
imap: < A6 OK LIST completed

foldername: "INBOX.INBOX.Trash"
listing "INBOX.INBOX.Trash"
imap: > A7 LIST INBOX.INBOX.Trash %
imap: < A7 OK LIST completed
getCurrentFolder() : null

the other side is a courier, nothing too extraordinary, really. but 
still, to me, this looks like they dont completely agree on the question 
wether the server should give absolute or relative names.

who's in the wrong, and what do i do to work around this?

regards

.rm