RE: [cp-patches] [Patch] support for direct buffers

[Jeroen Frijters]

Michael Koch wrote:
> Can you provide us with numbers that prove this ?

I could give some IKVM numbers, but I don't see how that would prove
anything. It's obviously highly VM specific.

Do you have any strong objection against using subclasses to distinguish
between writable and read-only buffers? The rational is pretty simple,
since we already pay for virtual method invocation, we might as well
make use of it to get rid of an additional test.

Regards,
Jeroen