RE: [cp-patches] Thread.sleep() update

[Jeroen Frijters]

Mark Wielaard wrote:
> And we would need at least good Mauve tests. I tried to write 
> good ones before writing and testing this new implementation (of
> course Thread tests are always tricky so if I made any mistakes
> please point them out). If you could make additions to test for
> the behavior you expect here that would be nice.

I don't think it would be reasonable for Mauve to test for the behavior
I expect. It's clearly not part of the spec and most likely even Windows
specific.

Beyond the test that you added there isn't much else I can think off. My
local version of IKVM passes all tests (without your most recent change
to Thread.sleep) and JDK 1.5 (incorrectly) fails on
valid(Long.MAX_VALUE, 999999);

Regards,
Jeroen