Re: [cp-patches] FYI: Fix serialization of Class objects

[Robert Schuster]

Mark Wielaard wrote:

On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 17:34 -0600, Archie Cobbs wrote:

  

I don't know much about this stuff, but the above code seems to
imply that something is not going to work if I have a class named
e.g., "int" or "long", which is otherwise perfectly valid. Is this
a bug in the serialization protocol spec or in our implementatin?
    

Ugh. You can have classes named after primitive types in the unnamed
package... Bah.

Forgive the usage of evil proprietary software but the javac does not primitive-named class in the unnamed package:

public class int {

}

It mourns when it reaches the "int". I'm pretty sure that is no implementation bug.
If it where possible to name a class 'int' how could I create an instance of it?

cu
Robert