classpath-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cp-patches] FYI: completing the tinyl TypeCodePackage


From: Andrew John Hughes
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] FYI: completing the tinyl TypeCodePackage
Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 23:49:14 +0000

On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 19:02 +0100, Meskauskas Audrius wrote:
> 2005-04-03  Audrius Meskauskas  <address@hidden>
> 
> * org/omg/CORBA/ org/omg/CORBA/TypeCodePackage/Bounds.java: new file
> * org/omg/CORBA/ org/omg/CORBA/TypeCodePackage/package.html: new file
> _______________________________________________ Classpath-patches mailing list

> address@hidden http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath-patches

As you probably noticed, the Bounds exception listed here
(org.omg.CORBA.TypeCodePackage.Bounds) needs to be explicitly (i.e. full
package name) thrown in org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode, otherwise it defaults to
the conflicting name, org.omg.CORBA.Bounds.  JAPI shows this up e.g.:

*   method org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode.member_visibility(int): throws
org.omg.CORBA.TypeCodePackage.Bounds in jdk15, but doesn't throw
org.omg.CORBA.TypeCodePackage.Bounds in classpath
  * method org.omg.CORBA.TypeCode.member_visibility(int): doesn't throw
    org.omg.CORBA.Bounds in jdk15, but throws org.omg.CORBA.Bounds in
    classpath

At the moment, they expect simply 'Bounds'.

Cheers,
-- 
Andrew :-)

Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint)
attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com

"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. 
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." 
-- Richard Stallman

"We've all been part of the biggest beta test the world has ever known
--
Windows" 
-- Victor Wheatman, Gartner


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]