Re: [cp-patches] Patch: implemented InvocationEvent.getThrowable

[Roman Kennke]

Hi there,

Am Mittwoch, den 09.11.2005, 10:40 -0500 schrieb Anthony Balkissoon:
> On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 18:30 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > >>>>> "Tony" == Anthony Balkissoon <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > Tony> Thanks for the advice Mark, I fixed this up and committed it.
> > Tony> 2005-11-08  Anthony Balkissoon  <address@hidden>
> > Tony>       * java/awt/event/InvocationEvent.java:
> > Tony>       (exception): Removed unnecessary field.
> > 
> > Actually, this field is still required for serialization.
> > 
> > Tom
> > 
> 
> Ack, okay I'll put it back.  For future reference, how do I know when a
> field is or isn't required for serialization?

In the API docs there is (for some classes like this) a page 'Serialized
form' that describes which fields are serialized. The link is below the
class description in the See also: field.

/Roman

signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil