Re: [cp-patches] FYI: java-nio adjustments for target/native

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Kennke <address@hidden> writes:

Roman> Then we can use shorter macro names or even better function
Roman> calls like cp_mem_alloc() or something similar.

Can we use the standard names, and then require the more bizarre
ports to do things like "#define malloc BlahBlah"?

The issue that came up here yesterday on irc is that, apparently, some
of these macros are only needed for ports that won't be in Classpath.

Roman> -  memcpy (_dst + dst_offset, src, dst_len);
Roman> +  TARGET_NATIVE_MEMORY_FAST_COPY(src + index,_dst + dst_offset,dst_len);

There are still platforms without memcpy?  What are they?
This seems like a great place for a target port to provide a
replacement function or macro.

Tom