[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem |
Date: |
06 Jul 2001 08:06:34 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
Patrick Doyle <address@hidden> writes:
> That sounds reasonable. It makes sense to me that something as
> fundamental as String shouldn't depend on other classes for its
> initialization, because you get a can of worms if one of those other
> classes needs a String for its own initialization.
>
> So, should String be reorganized to encourage this?
Perhaps. There is certainly no reason why we couldn't support more
than one implementation of a particular class selected by the user
using configure. There is a difference between how Classpath and gcj
handle this area (Strings, Characters, conversion, etc.) that would be
nice to resolve as well.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Re: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem, (continued)
Re: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem, John Leuner, 2001/07/05
RE: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem, Cierniak, Michal, 2001/07/06
Re: String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/07/06
String/Hashtable bootstrapping problem, Eric Blake, 2001/07/13