[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fw: java.lang.Constructor conformance
From: |
Tom Tromey |
Subject: |
Re: Fw: java.lang.Constructor conformance |
Date: |
13 Aug 2001 16:17:00 -0600 |
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
Dave> 1. Make sure we file the bug on Sun's site to force them to
Dave> clarify which is correct, their docs or their code.
Do you have to agree to anything in order to do this?
I can't agree to many things Sun wants, e.g. the SCSL.
If I need to do this to enter a bug, then that is not an option for me :-(
Dave> 2. Implement an environment variable that can be set from the
Dave> JVM command line to invoke the desired behavior . I don't know
Dave> what should be default behavior, though, Sun's current
Dave> implementation (e.g., use -DPEDANTIC=true for the other) or the
Dave> documented behavior (e.g., use -DJDK_COMPATIBILITY=true for Sun
Dave> compatiblity). Depending on my mood, I could go either way.
I think this is not really viable as an approach. What if I use
multiple libraries in my application? Then changing the
implementation of something like java.lang.Class could break other
parts of the code.
Sun did a pretty good job on the VM spec. Too bad they blew it on the
libraries.
Tom