Decision process

[Etienne M. Gagnon]

Hi again.

I have submitted a proposal for 2 minor (I think) license changes for NON-AWT 
Classpath code, which solve ambiguities in the current license and makes it 
friendlier to VM and library developers.

What is the formal decision process to get my proposal accepted or rejected?
[Is there a voting process?  Is RMS the sole decision maker, and so we should 
submit the question to him?  Is the GCC steering committee the authority in this 
case? I really have no idea!]

I think it would be a good idea, if no decision maker has any objection to it, 
to simply go forward and implement the proposal, or if there's one or more 
objections, to discuss them and possibly reject the proposal.

I am asking for this because I am afraid that otherwize my proposal will simply 
linger in the mailing list archive and be forgotten again for a few months, and 
then we will have to refresh everybody's memory again about the problems 
involved and the solution to them...

So, I repeate my question:  What is the process to get my proposal accepted or 
rejected formally?

Thanks!

Etienne
--
Etienne M. Gagnon                    http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM:                                       http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC:                                       http://www.sablecc.org/