[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately)
|
From: |
Brian Jones |
|
Subject: |
Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately) |
|
Date: |
12 Nov 2001 16:13:51 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 |
"Etienne M. Gagnon" <address@hidden> writes:
> If you modify this file, you may extend this exception to your
> version of the file, but you are not obligated to do so. If you
> do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your
> version.
>
> Again, there's an explicit permission to include the apply the exception to
> derivative work.
Why you would want to rewrite this part of their suggested wording to
the wording you've floated here and sent to RMS I don't really
understand. Your version just seems more wordy.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Per Bothner, 2001/11/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately),
Brian Jones <=
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Etienne M. Gagnon, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Brian Jones, 2001/11/12
- Re: The need for clarifying the GPL exception (unfortunately), Norbert Bollow, 2001/11/12
- Re: Simple Proposal, Tom Tromey, 2001/11/08
- Re: Simple Proposal, Mark Wielaard, 2001/11/09
Re: Simple Proposal, Chris Gray, 2001/11/08
Re: Simple Proposal, Brian Jones, 2001/11/08