classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: gcj vs classpath merge status


From: Andrew Haley
Subject: Re: gcj vs classpath merge status
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 14:34:03 +0000 (GMT)

Nic Ferrier writes:
 > As far as I can tell the Classpath/libgcj project is creating 3
 > things:
 > 
 > - a standard java source code base implementing the java libs
 > - native jni libs to implement the native parts of the libs
 > - native cni libs to implement the native parts of the libs for gcj
 > 
 > As such we should try to reduce the source code differences
 > between the CLasspath java and the GCJ java.

Sure, but CNI is a much better interface for performance -- and also
legibility.

Andrew.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]