Re: recent javadoc change

[Brian Jones]

Sascha Brawer <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric Blake <address@hidden> wrote on Tue, 30 Apr 2002 23:30:39 -0600:
> 
> >I have a complaint about this patch to the Javadoc. [...]
> >
> >/**
> > * In other words, both style 1:
> > * <pre>
> > * for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> > *   System.out.println(i);
> > * </pre>
> > *
> > * and style 2:
> ><pre>
> >for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
> >  System.out.println(i);
> ><pre>
> > *
> > * should have the same result in the compiled documentation;
> > * but I think style 1 is more consistent.
> > */
> 
> I agree with Eric, so I'll eventually review my recent commits and undo
> them as appropriate.  However, I think it would be fine to do the release
> with the Javadoc comments as they are in CVS. What do you think, Eric?

No, it doesn't matter for 0.04.  I prefer style 1.

Brian
-- 
Brian Jones <address@hidden>