[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpath] Re: bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame
From: |
C. Scott Ananian |
Subject: |
Re: [Classpath] Re: bug in gnu.vm.stack.StackFrame |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:43:17 -0400 (EDT) |
On 10 Sep 2002, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> StackFrame, ExecutionStack and StackTrace are a bit old. I don't know if
> there are VMs that still use these classes. For Throwable stack traces
> we now have java.lang.StackTraceElement and I will soon add my recent
> work on VMThrowable that I did for libgcj to Classpath. But for security
> managers and for AccessController the ExecutionStack could still be
> useful. Do VM implementers actually use/implement support for these
> classes?
I would actually like a linked list version of StackTraceElement (with a
'caller' field) that I could translate to/from an array representation
for interoperability with Throwable.get/setStackTrace(). The idea is
that as the exception is thrown from each method, I could link in a
single StackTraceElement onto the exception.
--scott
TASS early warning radar insurgent domestic disruption Attache MI6
ASW NSA Honduras Soviet Panama direct action counter-intelligence
( http://cscott.net/ )