[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 0.05
From: |
Brian Jones |
Subject: |
Re: 0.05 |
Date: |
24 Dec 2002 00:48:21 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Mark Wielaard <address@hidden> writes:
> On Mon, 2002-12-16 at 22:36, Brian Jones wrote:
> > * Integrate any remaining patches on Savannah as needed.
>
> I still have some patches "claimed" but I got absorbed in gcc 3.3
> testing and didn't have time to do more merging. I am currently looking
> at merging/fixing the ObjectStream classes between Classpath and libgcj
> but ran out of time and I probably won't have time the rest of the week
> to look after the JRVM patches. So feel free to analyze and/or patch the
> remaining items.
I haven't gotten to this yet. The gjdoc, dist, and automake crap took
me much longer than expected over the past few days.
> > * Full javadoc generated by gjdoc available for general consumption.
>
> There is only one open issue here that I know of. The produced HTML
> pages should contain the actual Copyright notice of the java files they
> were produced from not just some generic blurb. This is easy to
> implement for the GNU Classpath classes since they always have that
> statement as the first comment block at the top of the file. In general
> it will not be that easy to extract this info from the java source file.
Some way of specifying copyright/footer on a per package/class basis
would be great... but this appears to be added in the xsltproc step.
I've ignored it for now but there is a notice to this affect that you
describe on our website.
I've just committed a large number of changes to finish bringing gjdoc
generation into the build/dist mechanism, fix some broken things like
DESTDIR, uninstall, and too many invocations of gen-classlist.sh. I
think make distcheck almost works now (fails in distcleancheck), but
it's not a big deal either way.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- Re: 0.05, (continued)
- Re: 0.05, Brian Jones, 2002/12/16
- Re: 0.05, Nic Ferrier, 2002/12/16
- Re: 0.05, Mark Wielaard, 2002/12/17
- Re: 0.05, Brian Jones, 2002/12/17
- Re: 0.05, Nic Ferrier, 2002/12/17
Re: 0.05, Etienne M. Gagnon, 2002/12/16
Re: 0.05, Sascha Brawer, 2002/12/17
Re: 0.05, Mark Wielaard, 2002/12/17
Re: 0.05, Patrik Reali, 2002/12/18