[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: java.net.URI implementation
|
From: |
Brian Jones |
|
Subject: |
Re: java.net.URI implementation |
|
Date: |
10 Feb 2003 11:28:21 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Giannis Georgalis <address@hidden> writes:
> Please, tell me your thoughts and suggestions about this matter.
ANTLR is usually the better choice for parsing as far as I know, but
I'm not really that knowledgable on grammars and parsing anyway. It's
fine to do this btw, since we can checkin the parser generated classes
to avoid a build dependency here.
Brian
--
Brian Jones <address@hidden>
- java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation,
Brian Jones <=
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Giannis Georgalis, 2003/02/10
- Re: java.net.URI implementation, Per Bothner, 2003/02/10
Re: java.net.URI implementation, Stephen Crawley, 2003/02/10