[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: More finalize woes
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: More finalize woes |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2003 16:18:51 +0100 |
Aaron M. Renn wrote:
> Jeroen Frijters (address@hidden) wrote:
> > Classpath's java.io.BufferedOutputStream has a finalize,
> but Java API
> > docs say it shouldn't have it.
>
> It appears to be commented out. For finalizers, I'm not sure that it
> is a huge deal if we have one when there isn't one listed in the API
> documentation. Though if one isn't needed, we should probably get rid
> of it.
You're right. I missed that. Sorry.
Regards,
Jeroen
- Re: More finalize woes, (continued)
- Re: More finalize woes, Stephen Crawley, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Stephen Crawley, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Per Bothner, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Stephen Crawley, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Per Bothner, 2003/03/07
- Re: More finalize woes, Tom Tromey, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Brian Jones, 2003/03/06
- Re: More finalize woes, Per Bothner, 2003/03/07
- Re: More finalize woes, Chris Gray, 2003/03/07
- Re: More finalize woes, Stephen Crawley, 2003/03/09
RE: More finalize woes,
Jeroen Frijters <=