classpath
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: classpath ./ChangeLog ./THANKYOU ./configure.in...


From: Raif S. Naffah
Subject: Re: classpath ./ChangeLog ./THANKYOU ./configure.in...
Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 09:54:39 +1100
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

On Sunday 30 March 2003 02:18, Brian Jones wrote:
> "Raif S. Naffah" <address@hidden> writes:
> > On Saturday 29 March 2003 18:27, Brian Jones wrote:
> > > Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
> > > > >>>>> "Brian" == Brian Jones <address@hidden> writes:
> > > >
> > > > Brian> There are still some getInstance problems with some of
> > > > the Brian> things I recently checked in though a check through
> > > > my Mauve Brian> results appears to indicate nothing terribly
> > > > new here.
> > > >
> > > > Are these getInstance problems revealed by Mauve?
> > > > Or did you find them some other way?
> > > > I'd like to put all this java.security stuff into libgcj, but
> > > > I'd also prefer to wait if there is a regression that will be
> > > > ironed out soon...
> > >
> > > I looked at the Mauve results before and after and essentially
> > > the same getInstance problems and I don't know much about it
> > > other than that.  It could just be because I don't have
> > > gnu-crypto configured with the mauve testing.  Need to
> > > investigate.
> >
> > the Mauve tests for the getInstance() methods (at least those i
> > added recently) do not rely/depend on GNU Crypto.  all the
> > testcases, install their own, temporary, providers.
> >
> > to test the patch i submitted earlier, i used my local copy of gcc,
> > to which i applied the same patch.  all the security related Mauve
> > tests passed.
>
> It's broken under Kissme/Classpath.

i was unable to test with Kissme because the latter is broken (at least 
in my env).  the only reliable way of testing i found was to do as 
suggested above --i.e. apply the same patch to the gcc/libjava tree-- 
and then run the gcc make check with:

$ MAUVEDIR=path/to/your/mauve/dir make check RUNTESTFLAGS="mauve.exp"

of course this may not be appropriate for Classpath (and non-GCJ) 
specific patches.


cheers;
rsn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Que du magnifique

iD8DBQE+hiQv+e1AKnsTRiERA1yqAJ9l/v8HuzsXIqgsRa6UX1FpBZwI6ACgprWx
XooGZAOpo1PK1usovwxOp+o=
=wgwH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]