Re: Why gcj? WAS: Re: Benchmarks (who has the fastest free VM)

[Michael Koch]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

> | Christopher: Please use a valid From: address next time.
>
> Eh? Was address@hidden not given as the From address? Or do
> you mean that I accidently send to you instead of the list, due to
> the Reply-To header being missing. I see that mailman is being
> used... perhaps the option to append a Reply-To header might be
> nice? Or am I simply to inattentive? I don't mean that
> sarcastically, either, because I am not, for all appearance a n00b,
> but merely am not- er- as graceful as I should be. Not as attentive
> to detail and such, if you catch my drift.

I mean the following I got from your (or your providers mail server):

The original message was received at Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:53:03 +0200 
(MEST)
from dynadsl-080-228-75-149.ewetel.net [80.228.75.149]

   ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<address@hidden>
    (reason: 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list 
(#5.7.1))

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
.. while talking to pk.greens.org.:
>>> DATA
<<< 553 sorry, your envelope sender is in my badmailfrom list (#5.7.1)
550 5.1.1 <address@hidden>... User unknown
<<< 503 RCPT first (#5.5.1)



Michael
- -- 
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/Coi9WSOgCCdjSDsRArZOAJ4jxsWIjYnYeKVuFZVjlDlVbaHhDwCglck8
zaRLGrbFCIG/f4LkdE3oyS0=
=EaVk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----