|
From: | Stuart Ballard |
Subject: | org.omg link on Classpath homepage |
Date: | Mon, 20 Oct 2003 15:30:58 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030527 Debian/1.3.1-2 |
1) I can't actually find any downloadable implementation of the org.omg packages in the omg site. It might be helpful to provide a more direct link to exactly where the code can be found.
2) Last I heard, there were some questions about the freeness and/or GPL compatibility of the OMG's license. If that has changed and their classes are clearly unambiguously free and GPL compatible, wouldn't it be a good idea to include them directly in Classpath's CVS? And if not... a) If they're not free, isn't it a violation of GNU project policy to link to them at all - ESPECIALLY without prominently stating that they're not free? b) If they are free but aren't GPL-compatible, shouldn't there be a prominent warning because (if I understand the issues correctly) that would make anything that's simultaneously a derived work of Classpath and the org.omg packages completely unredistributable?
If they *are* free and GPL-compatible but simply not included in Classpath's CVS, it would be nice if whoever's producing japi files these days would include them in Classpath's japi: That would probably increase the number of green packages substantially[1]! :)
Stuart.[1] Classpath vs JDK1.2 is currently red in only two places: javax.swing and org.omg. You could cut that in half :)
-- Stuart Ballard, Senior Web Developer FASTNET - Web Solutions (215) 283-2300, ext. 126 www.fast.net
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |