[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath and org.omg.*
From: |
Mark Wielaard |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath and org.omg.* |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:57:36 +0200 |
Hi,
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 22:57, Stuart Ballard wrote:
> Chris Gray wrote:
> > But it would of course be incompatible with the GPL ...
>
> Probably, but definitely compatible with Classpath's modified version of
> the GPL.
>
> There would be problems for GPL software that wished to *use* the
> org.omg classes, but not for the integration of the classes into
> Classpath itself.
A solution that would prevent programs distributed under the GPL to use
our library would not be very productive. Lots of GNU software is
distributed under the GPL so we would not integrate very well with the
rest of the system in that case.
Cheers,
Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, (continued)
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/22
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Andrew Haley, 2003/10/22
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Mark Wielaard, 2003/10/22
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/22
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Brian Jones, 2003/10/22
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/22
- Classpath and org.omg.*, Stephen Crawley, 2003/10/22
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/23
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Chris Gray, 2003/10/23
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/23
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*,
Mark Wielaard <=
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Mark Wielaard, 2003/10/23
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Bryce McKinlay, 2003/10/23
- Re: Classpath and org.omg.*, Mark Wielaard, 2003/10/23
- Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Brian Jones, 2003/10/23
Re: org.omg link on Classpath homepage, Stuart Ballard, 2003/10/22