[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rant [Was: Unresolved CVS conflict]
From: |
Thomas |
Subject: |
Re: Rant [Was: Unresolved CVS conflict] |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:41:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 02 April 2004 10:09, Etienne Gagnon wrote:
> > Etienne> Arch is nice but does not allow a single file to be split
> > Etienne> (which does happen regularly, specially when doing
> > Etienne> Object-Oriented development, e.g. spin-off package classes
> > Etienne> [Method=> Method + VMMethod]).
> >
> > Subversion can do this?
>
> Of course! Arch's main architect thinks that this should not be needed
> (and argues strongly about "splitting" files), as it would break Arch's
> view of "merging". But, my experience is that splitting a file *does*
> happen.
I tried Arch and found it impossible to use; and really impossible to explain
to co-workers that just want to commit. Its very clear the main architect is
a long time c-hacker. As arch does not really fit OO code structuring very
well. It certainly failed miserably in the error handling and (therefor)
usability department.
I never tried subversion; but I still plan to do a pilot on it for my
companies development team.
- --
Regards
Thomas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAbVGaCojCW6H2z/QRAjjrAKC5lmyUxjKfJyJOxJd/JVNaeiMJ5wCfcg3P
pHSD95TDlzNfyoVseQEax7k=
=6Jce
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----