[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues
From: |
Andrew Haley |
Subject: |
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Apr 2004 19:06:09 +0100 |
Etienne Gagnon writes:
> Andrew Haley wrote:
> > Well, not exactly: I'm suggesting that we wrap all those longs in an
> > opaque type. But otherwise, yes.
>
> So, how do you do opaque types, in Java?
You write the code using a class that wraps your native pointer: a
class with a single member.
> And how do you guarantee portability to 128bit systems?
You tell people "if you have a pointer that won't fit in a jlong,
you'll need to change three lines of code".
Andrew.
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, (continued)
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Ingo Prötel, 2004/04/07
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/06
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Etienne Gagnon, 2004/04/06
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/07
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/06
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Etienne Gagnon, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues,
Andrew Haley <=
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Michael Koch, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/05
- Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/05
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Andrew Haley, 2004/04/04
Re: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/04
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/05
RE: Classpath build process and VM-specific issues, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/05