[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance
From: |
Anthony Green |
Subject: |
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Apr 2004 07:30:00 -0700 |
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 15:08, Jonathan Pryor wrote:
> AOT (or pre-JITing) assemblies is not as useful as you'd think. It has
> two primary effects:
>
> - Reduce memory requirements, as memory doesn't need to be allocated
> for the JITed code
> - Decrease startup time, as (again) the JITing doesn't need to be
> done.
Are you saying that mono doesn't have the ability to create shared
libraries?
AG
--
Anthony Green <address@hidden>
Red Hat, Inc.
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, (continued)
Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Archie Cobbs, 2004/04/12
Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/12
RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/04/13
- RE: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Stuart Ballard, 2004/04/13
- Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Mark Wielaard, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jonathan Pryor, 2004/04/13
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance,
Anthony Green <=
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Jonathan Pryor, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Anthony Green, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Miguel de Icaza, 2004/04/15
Re: [Mono-list] Re: The Mauve unicode testcase and VM performance, Miguel de Icaza, 2004/04/14