[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Eclipse 3.0
|
From: |
Michael Koch |
|
Subject: |
Re: Eclipse 3.0 |
|
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jul 2004 13:38:02 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.2 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Freitag, 2. Juli 2004 13:30 schrieb Andrew John Hughes:
> Throwing an Error or similar in all cases would solve this problem
> in a proactive way and still allow compilation. I think people
> would be more annoyed to find that an error they thought they had
> is due to nulls from Classpath.
We have discussed this at length on this list already and came to no
solution everyone was happy with. So nothing was done.
Michael
- --
Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5UkaWSOgCCdjSDsRAkBhAJ0Ulg8vDCVo0A8XGBSN77TZ1nDpqgCfRbwr
GW4aFtvMcuXI+nbKAqChlAs=
=HCmQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Mark Wielaard, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Dalibor Topic, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal, Casey Marshall, 2004/07/02
- Re: Eclipse 3.0 and unimplemented methods proposal, Andrew John Hughes, 2004/07/03
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, Andrew Haley, 2004/07/02
Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02
Re: Eclipse 3.0, Roman Kennke, 2004/07/02