[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Eclipse 3.0
From: |
Jeroen Frijters |
Subject: |
RE: Eclipse 3.0 |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 15:06:16 +0200 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> Robert Lougher wrote:
> > OK, I'm yelling :) Please don't use Mark's patch!
> >
> > It "fixes" it by stopping resolution finding the method on Object.
> > However, it is legal to have an invokeinterface on an Object method
> > (as all interfaces subclass Object).
> >
> > Instead, please use the attached patch to the interpreter. This
> > converts an invokeinterface on an Object method into an
> invokevirtual
> > (which is what 1.4 javac does anyway, but not jikes or 1.3 javac).
>
> The JVMS is clear that invokeinterface is only to be used on
> interface methods.
I think you two are talking about two different things. I think Robert
means that it is legal to use invokeinterface on an Object method
through an interface type. So this is legal:
invokeinterface java/lang/Runnable/toString()Ljava/lang/String;
Regards,
Jeroen
- Re: Eclipse 3.0, (continued)
RE: Eclipse 3.0, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/07/03
RE: Eclipse 3.0,
Jeroen Frijters <=
Re: Eclipse 3.0, Robert Lougher, 2004/07/06
RE: Eclipse 3.0, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/07/06