Re: japi note

[Stuart Ballard]

Tom Tromey wrote:
> I put it on my to-do list.

Cool. I released 0.9.4 with your bugfix and the constant-field fix, so 
you should be able to improve the score significantly (at least back up 
to 67.7) by using this version. Kaffe people take note also, your 
results will suffer unless you generate your japi files with the new 
version :)

> I've heard on irc that the only way to get eclipse 3 working is to use
> the apache javax.xml stuff (xalan I think).  I'm already building that
> as part of rhug, maybe I should run the comparison using that.

Hmm. If the Classpath project officially recommends one source for 
javax.xml, it seems like it would be misrepresenting the project if we 
created a classpath.japi using something else. I'm not sure how official 
the recommendation of JAXP is. Mark?

> Yeah.  Can Tritonus be built with free tools?  I haven't tried that
> yet...

Dalibor, Kaffe builds Tritonus entirely with free tools, right?

> Ideally jacorb or openorb would be included here too, but I'm pretty
> sure those aren't yet buildable for various reasons.

Yeah, I'd love to see that huge red org.omg section disappear :)

> I believe it affected the JDK results as well, though I don't have an
> example.

Yes, a quick zdiff confirmed that the jdk japis were definitely changed 
by the fix :)

Stuart.

--
Stuart Ballard, Senior Web Developer
NetReach, Inc.
(215) 283-2300, ext. 126
http://www.netreach.com/