Re: Bug#290377: classpath-common: why don't you provide a jar archive ?

[jewel]

Do all classpath VMs have native code to load jar files? Does it make
sense to distribute a jar instead?

John Leuner

On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 03:13, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Package: classpath-common
> Version: 2:0.13-3
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> 
>   Hello !
> 
>   I was wondering why you don't provide a jar archive ? It seems to me that 
> it is the standard way of 
> providing libraries in java - not all of the JVM recognise directly a zip 
> file...
> 
>   Thanks for considering this !
> 
>       Vincent Fourmond
> 
> 
> 
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.7
> Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
> 
> -- no debconf information
>