Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management

classpath

From:	Nic Ferrier
Subject:	Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management
Date:	Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:01:55 +0000

If MX4J was dual licenced (maybe with the LGPL) I would help fix it.

-- 
Nic Ferrier
http://www.tapsellferrier.co.uk

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

javax.management, Ewout Prangsma, 2005/01/15
- Re: javax.management, Chris Burdess, 2005/01/15
  - Re: javax.management, Michael Koch, 2005/01/15
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Fernando Nasser, 2005/01/18
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Andrew John Hughes, 2005/01/18
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Michael Koch, 2005/01/18
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Mark Wielaard, 2005/01/18
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Thomas Zander, 2005/01/19
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Nic Ferrier <=
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Fernando Nasser, 2005/01/19
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Nic Ferrier, 2005/01/19
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Fernando Nasser, 2005/01/19
    - Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Robert Schuster, 2005/01/19
  - Re: javax.management, Andrew John Hughes, 2005/01/15
    - Message not available
    - Re: Classpath 1.5 API coverage (was: javax.management), Andrew John Hughes, 2005/01/16
    - Re: Classpath 1.5 API coverage (was: javax.management), Stuart Ballard, 2005/01/17
  - Re: javax.management, Sascha Brawer, 2005/01/17