[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management
|
From: |
Thomas Zander |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management |
|
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:34:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.91 |
On Wednesday 19 January 2005 01:42, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > > MX4J uses the Apache Software License, which, IIRC, is
> > > incompatible with the Classpath license.
> >
> > No its not incompatible with the Classpath license, its
> > incompatible with pure GPL.
>
> Which is indeed a problem because that means we cannot include these
> together with GNU Classpath (as external packages) or recommend them
> to people to build larger works on (since those would then also be
> GPL incompatible).
According to one interpretation of the Apache licence its legal to fork
the code and re-license it under GPL.
--
Thomas Zander
pgpfbp984oZkZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- javax.management, Ewout Prangsma, 2005/01/15
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Nic Ferrier, 2005/01/18
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Fernando Nasser, 2005/01/19
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Nic Ferrier, 2005/01/19
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Fernando Nasser, 2005/01/19
- Re: [Classpathx-discuss] Re: javax.management, Robert Schuster, 2005/01/19
Re: javax.management, Andrew John Hughes, 2005/01/15
Re: javax.management, Sascha Brawer, 2005/01/17